Texas Woman University NCAA Bylaws Questions
Kant’s categorical imperative expresses his belief regarding what makes an action truly moral. One requirement is that it be based on reason not emotion. Our emotions and our prejudices, or “dispositions” in Kant’s words, will mislead us about what the “right” thing to do is. According to Kant, it is only through the use of reason that we can identify what our moral duty is. The idea that guide our actions should be based on our understanding of our duty is reflected in Carter Druse’s father’s admonition to his son, “[W]hatever may occur do what you conceive to be your duty.” Carter acts in accordance with his father’s words, with what he believes to be his duty.
Do you believe Carter acted in accordance with his duty? Do you believe he therefore acted morally? Why or why not? Provide reasons for your answers. (Remember that it’s perfectly OK t be unsure about whether you believe an act is right or wrong and to give the pros/cons you’re weighing in trying to reach a decision.)
- Is it fair for a school to be held responsible for the actions of its “representatives of athletic interests?” Explain. (See Bylaw 6.4.2)
- How does Bylaw 10.1 assist the NCAA’s enforcement staff when it is conducting an investigation of misconduct on the part of a coach, administrator or student-athlete? (See Bylaw 10.1)
