Spy Research Paper, history homework help
Spy Research Paper
Topic: The Rosenbergs (Julius and Ethel Rosenberg) Two Part Project
Part one: Paper
1. Targeted paper length is 8 – 10 full pages in length, double space, 12” font used throughout (not counting the title page, and works cited)
2. Provided draft paper containing draft outline.
3. Body and Paragraph Construction/Mechanics: Paper included all of the following: Introduction with purpose statement, body, and conclusion AND: Entire paper was clear and concise and understandable in a single rapid reading. Generally free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. Minimal use of passive voice. All acronyms are spelled out first.
4. Content and Themes: Student thoroughly described each theme and provided detailed examples or evidence for each of the following themes:
1.Background
2.Indicators
3.Material Compromised
4.Handler
5.Investigation
Evidence or examples presented clearly supported and enhanced overall understanding.
5. Analysis: Presented own detailed, strong and convincing analysis, based on research, to answer each question.
-What impact the spy’s actions had on U.S. national defense.
-How was the spy successful and/or manage to elude capture from authorities throughout the case?
-What could have been done to prevent this incident?
And provided at least two examples to answer each question.
Part Two: PowerPoint
Create a PowerPoint (Brief limit not exceeding 20 minutes.) Using the same information from the part one paper.
1. Organization: PowerPoint is clear, logical, and well organized. Listeners can follow along easily.
2. Use of Visual Aids: Visual aids included all of the following:
-Visual aids clearly support and enhance the learning objective, complicated concepts or idea being discussed.
-Quality of aids – good contrast/color/balance
-Generally free of spelling errors or spelling errors
-All acronyms were spelled out first time
3. Content and Themes: Student thoroughly described each theme and provided detailed examples or evidence for each of the following themes:
1.Background
2.Indicators
3.Material Compromised
4.Handler
5.Investigation
Evidence or examples presented clearly supported and enhanced overall understanding.
4. Analysis: Presented own detailed, strong and convincing analysis, based on research, to answer each question.
-What impact the spy’s actions had on U.S. national defense.
-How was the spy successful and/or manage to elude capture from authorities throughout the case?
-What could have been done to prevent this incident?
And provided at least two examples to answer each question.
Provide brief speaker notes for each slide. “PLEASE NO PLAGIARISM” ALSO SEE ATTACHMENT FOR GUIDANCE.
